Friday, July 3, 2009

Summer 09 begins


Last Sunday was my final Sunday in my internship at St Simon's.  It's been a wonderful experience, and I've really enjoyed it.  On my last Sunday, the kids in the church school gave me a Build A Bear they had designed and stuffed.  The bear, of course, was wearing a Yankees hat.
I return to St Paul's Cathedral this Sunday, but the Dean has very graciously given me the summer off.  I'm looking forward to it!  I expect to spend the next two years and the last part of my formation at the Cathedral, so there's plenty of time to be serving, preaching, and learning.

I'm posting my last two sermons I gave at St Simon's, the first from Trinity Sunday and the final one from this last Sunday.

Trinity Sunday

In the Name of the one God in three Persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.  Amen.

 

In the early afternoon of January 3, 2007, on the platform of the New York City subway at 137th and Broadway, a first-year film student suffered a seizure, and collapsed.  Two strangers rushed to his aid; as they helped him to his feet, he stumbled, and fell onto the subway tracks below.  The lights of the No. 1 train approached, and one of the strangers who had come to the student’s aid now leapt onto the tracks, pressing himself and the disoriented student into a 1-foot gap as the subway passed over them, inches above their heads.  When they emerged, in a blue hat now slicked with grease from the subway that raced above him, the hero refused medical help, as there was nothing wrong with him.  He told bewildered lookers-on “I don’t feel like I did something spectacular; I just saw someone who needed help.  I did what I felt was right.”

On April 9, 1940, an ascendant Germany attacked its northern neighbor, crossing the border with Denmark, seizing King Christian X who remained in his kingdom during the occupation.  The occupation of Denmark was an uncomfortable one; though many of the nation’s vital functions continued, it was a difficult time for Denmark.  By 1943, Danish resistance to Nazi occupation had increased; as a result, Germany dissolved the Danish government.  News was leaked that the Danish Jewish population would be extradited from Denmark to the camps in Eastern Europe.  Thanks to the willingness and generosity of countless Danish civilians who endangered their lives and their very kingdom’s existence, almost every single one of the 7,500 Danish Jews were secretly ferried across the Baltic Sea to Sweden and to safety.  The Danes saw that these women, children, and men were their friends, their neighbors, or even only strangers they passed on the street, but they were most certainly Danes, and must not be sent to their deaths, even at the risk of the destruction of their entire kingdom and national way of life.

We frequently pass our days in a manner which requires enough energy to get through the day, get food on the table, the bills paid, the laundry done, and maybe a few minutes to read or relax before going to bed.  We frequently pass our days encountering dozens of others in the street, driving down the road, in Wegmans, at work, and we pass by, untouching and untouched.  Every once in a while, we encounter heroism, greatness of heart, saints with halos glowing, seraphim with six wings fluttering, heroes like the subway rescuer, like the people of Denmark, who placed virtue and love for strangers above their own safety, above any other good.  Sometimes, not only do we encounter heroes, we are heroes.

In a silent garden, dark with the night pressing in, a man came in secret to speak to another man.  The man who came in secret had likely been passing his days in a manner that requires enough energy to get through the day.  But, he had encountered a man who lived his life differently.  And so, in secret, Nicodemus enters the garden at night to speak to that man.  Nicodemus encounters Christ in that garden, and is changed.  Nicodemus encounters the invitation from Christ to live deeply, to live in a manner that sees radiant shining glory in every moment, which finds in each person the image of the living God.  Christ invites Nicodemus into the very life of God, offering the opportunity to move from living by just scraping by to living in explosive potential.  Nicodemus is invited to be reborn, to accept the power of the Holy Spirit working in Nicodemus and through Nicodemus.  Christ invites Nicodemus to allow the Holy Spirit to sweep him into the life God shares with Himself. 

What is this invitation to new life?  What does it mean to live in the life of God?  It begins by accepting that the way we perceive the world and our place in it is not reality.  We can only sense our tiny little part in a massive cosmos, our small little place in an incomprehensible large whole.  Frequently, our perspective causes us to feel insignificant, normal, mundane, and anything but holy, glorious, and mighty.  Our lives have a tendency to wear us down, rather than energize, invigorate, and send us out in mission.  Living the life of God, as Christ invited Nicodemus to do, means shifting from our outlook to the outlook of the Undivided Trinity.  We enter into the mind of the Trinity in the same way that the Trinity entered into our world: through Christ.  Christ is the window into God’s soul, the door, the gate.  We live in the life of the Trinity when we confess that Christ is Lord, Lord reigning in heaven, Lord reigning from the cross, and the Lord of our own daily  lives.  Christ is Lord of our lives on Sunday mornings, but we must also work to allow him to be Lord in our marriage, in our work, in our relationship with our children, with the people I can’t stand at Verizon, with the annoying man who thinks it’s appropriate to brake when merging onto the 190.  We enter into the life of God when we think about who Christ is more often than just Sunday morning.

The life of God is one which reveals wonders: we see strangers walking by: living the life of God, Christ helps us to see the threads which bind us together as a people damaged by one another’s racism, sexism, pride, snobbery, and failure to respect.  We go to work and do enough to get by; living the life of God, we find those ways to show that Christ is our Lord by working with kindness, with sympathy, and with joy. 

All around us, the world is lonely, lost, and scared.  The world emits a rocking sigh, a sigh which only the Trinity can hear.  But, when we live our lives united to the Trinity, we become the means to reach out and minister to the world, to heal it, to help it through its struggles, and to make it joyful.  We work together with those who have gone before us, like St Nicodemus, and with those who hear the world’s sighs, like the hero in the subway and the Danish people.  When we continue to expect mediocrity and mundaneness from ourselves and others, we will continue to receive it.  When, in union with the Trinity, we see hidden mysteries, and challenge ourselves to live with joy, with completeness and in service to others and a hurting world, then the Trinity walks among us here in Buffalo, and the face of strangers we pass in the street are seen for what they truly are: a reflection of the undivided Trinity one God.

We find in living in the Trinity, being born again, as Christ described it to St Nicodemus, an alternate way of seeing the world, for we see it with the Trinity’s eyes.  We take so much for granted: that life surely must be harsh, grueling, and with only a few bright spots to get us through.  That strangers are different, hostile, and not worth knowing.  That other cultures and religions are threatening, dangerous, and polluting.  That Republicans are stingy.  That Democrats are out-of-touch with reality.  That we live as flawed people who cannot be healed, as boring drones whom God must surely love because he has to, not because he wants to.  This is our worldview, and we cling to it.  But Christ, as the gate into the Trinity, shows that those things that we have taken for granted are illusions.  Christ shows that the true reality can only be seen by looking with the Trinity’s eyes.  All around us: joy.  Joy and wonder, wholeness and healing being offered, life blossoming and being hallowed by the Trinity who always reaches out in love to shelter and sanctify.  When we live with our view, we live a lie; when we live as the Trinity lives, we enter our bliss.

So do not be fooled: our faith is not one of crushing burdens and obligations.  Our Church is not dying and fading away; the truth of our Christ is not being lost to a generation that no longer needs it.  This is the view of the world, not of God.  The Trinity knows that Christ is still Lord, and that the Church will thrive and through it, God will continue to dialogue with the world.  Living the life of the Trinity means looking between the gaps and finding divinity in the smallest things, even the dandelions in the front yard, and in your neighbor’s barking dog. So do not be fooled: the life of the Trinity to which we are being invited is not far, is not impossible.  St Nicodemus accepted; the hero in the subway chose to live in the Trinity; the entire nation of Denmark looked with God’s eyes and chose to live a divine life.  Christ will invite us again today, as we receive him in the Eucharist, to be born again and live in the Trinity.  I extend to you, in the name of Christ as he waited in the dark garden for one who was seeking him, to receive the Eucharist today in a way that you never have before, with joy and fervor, and recognize that God is come to you today, to bid you to live his life with him.  When you say Amen as you receive today, let it be your acceptance of entry into the life of the Trinity, and leave behind your dusty ho-hum outlook, and take on the mind of the Trinity.

Amen.


And the Fourth Sunday after Pentecost

Mark 5:21-43

In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.

This is my last Sunday here at St. Simon’s, and the Gospel today has a line in it that intrigues me.  This line has very little to do with the story told in the Gospel; and so, in fact, my entire sermon has very little to do with the story in the Gospel today of the raising of Jairus’ daughter.   Today’s excerpt from St Mark’s Gospel concludes with “He gave strict orders not to let anyone know about this”.

The ‘he’ in this sentence is Christ, and he’s ordering all those who witnessed him bring a young girl back from death never to speak of it.  Ironically, this command to remain silent was recorded in the Gospel of St. Mark, who himself was not an apostle, and therefore was not at this particular event, so it’s clear that someone blabbed.  Christ ordering silence about his miracles?  Why would he do that?  It may be that Christ knew that for Jairus and for those who witnessed it, the return to life of this little girl was a beautiful, moving, and private thing.  A thing that struck them deeply, and would remain with them until death.  Events like this, when holiness touches mere frail humanity and when life returns where death had lurked, these events are holy and are occasions when there is a thinness in the world, and hidden things are revealed.  Christ may have ordered silence about this event, in order to allow that sacredness that each person witnessed to remain with them, a secret shared with few people, a time when God showed his face.  It may be that Christ knew that announcing such a thing publicly would pass along the news of it, but not the grace of it.

The Gospel on my first Sunday here, however, was very different.  It’s been a long and very rewarding six months, so let’s reflect back to the Gospel on Epiphany, my first Sunday here at St. Simon’s.  That Gospel, from St Luke, tells of the visit of the Wise Men from the East, who came to Bethlehem to worship a king whose birth had been foretold to them by a supernatural heavenly object.  Epiphany shows us the infant Christ, visited by foreign nations, adored and worshipped by strangers, by aliens, by Gentiles.  The Gospel story of Epiphany is anything but a command to keep secret.  In the Epiphany, we see Christ’s presence shouted from the rooftop, with foreigners coming to worship and carrying back to their homes the tale of a great soul newly born.  There are no commands to keep silent, no whispers to keep mouths shut.  In Epiphany, we proclaim Christ as God made man, come to live among us.  At the resurrection of Jairus’ daughter, we are told to keep it to ourselves.

This concept of secrecy is fairly common in St Mark’s Gospel.  It’s referred to in 20th century biblical theology as the Messianic secret.  Frequently in St Mark’s Gospel, Christ commands his followers, and even demons, to remain silent, to tell no one.  He hides his divinity in parables, and when he performs miracles,  enforces a gag order.  How can we reconcile a Christ who sometimes demands silence and who sometimes loudly proclaims his divine glory?

For each of us, the lives we live are two-fold: the perceptions and interactions we share with others around us which bind us together as a people, which hold us together as a thing united; and on the other side, our own personal interior lives in which we speak silently and dream dreams, rehash previous failures, relive our former victories, and assign to ourselves the adornments of our own personalities and characters.  With one face, we turn to the world, allowing ourselves to see and be seen, and with the other face, we reflect inward to what only our own hearts may know, to the secrets and joys which our language and art, our scripture, literature, and blogs, our prayer books, morning newspapers, and evening news can describe but never fully capture.  We are creatures who turn toward one another, and who also fold inward, talking to the world and also talking to ourselves.

For each of us, the way the world perceives us and the way we truly are in ourselves are frequently at odds.  A woman as a public figure infrequently is the same woman in the quiet of her own mind, and the man whom we all admire is not always the same within his deepest thoughts.  No one can escape the friction of living simultaneously in community and living within her own mind; no saint was only contemplative, no hero was only enmeshed in the lives of others, no man has ever been untorn between others and self, and the conflict this creates.  Even the Christ, when he clothed himself in human flesh, becoming human in Bethlehem, faced the great duel of having both an interior and a corporate life.

It is through the Gospels that we have passed down to us the story of Christ as he lived as a man, and it is in the Gospels where we see the duel in Christ as he struggled, as all of us do, with being on the threshold which places us both in a world peopled by others and in a world where we are the only citizen.  Christ is not exempt from this effort to remain unified, whole, and yet divided.  The Gospels relate to us the very thoughts of Christ, how he felt, his ideas about himself and his relationship to the Almighty God.  In these places, we have a glimpse of the interior life of Christ, as Christ was to himself.  Just as we have slow, meandering thoughts as we drift to sleep on warm summer evenings, and terrifying worries that paralyze us in fear and inaction, the same was true for Christ.  He shared with us the fullness of our own individual experiences of having an interior life.  The interior life, by definition is lonesome, and can be lonely.  No one may ever enter another’s interior life.  Yet, we live together, united by our commonalities, and by our relationships to one another, and our corporate relationship to our creator.  Our individual interior lives, our own secret minds, are matched with the way we interact and share with one another.  And this is where some of our trouble begins.

Having a foot on both shores causes some tension: it’s easy to be generous in your own thoughts, but starts to get difficult to be generous when someone else is there in need.  It’s sometimes easier to be honest with ourselves than with others.  We push on one side and pull on another, our striving to manifest externally how we feel internally frequently is imperfect.  Christ, however, models to us an example of a person who communicated to others the completeness of his interior life.  His translation from interior to exterior was flawless, and without blemish or miscommunication.  Those with whom he interacted are frequently recorded in the Gospels as being amazed at his words, shocked by his actions, dumbstruck by his convictions.  Christ’s ability to manifest to others his interior life is known as genuineness.  No person was ever more genuine, more able to perfectly express to others his own mind.

But Christ experienced this pull of his interior life and so commands silence and experienced the push of public life, and publicizes himself as Messiah.  Though he is entirely genuine and in him there is no insincerity, he still lives in two very different spheres. 

Frequently, we are willing to see ourselves in the best light, and other in the worst light.  We allow ourselves some latitude, knowing that we acted with the best of intentions, or at least we tried hard, or gave it our best shot.  However, we often expect that others do not do the same, that the part of their lives which we see is as flawed as the life they live to themselves.  We do not give others the benefit of the doubt, do not extend mercy and understanding, do not give others the chance to live up to their calling.  We experience conflict between how we see ourselves and how others see us, but we don’t always remember that others experience that conflict, as well.  The ability of Christ to reflect that all those around him want to be saints, but are weak is what made Christ the great model for all: he saw into the hearts of others, into their good intentions and feeble efforts to make those intentions come to life.  He saw them as they saw themselves, striving toward the Kingdom of Heaven, but confused on how to get there.  He knew that a command to silence and another command to proclaim his greatness were not contradictory, but were both parts of himself, but understood that others were confused, were missing the point.  He always gave them the benefit of the doubt.

It is clear from the disparate ways Christ acted in the world that he understood that we do not live among hard and fast rules, always applicable and never changing.  He saw shades of gray, and maybe even of brown, blue, pink, and other colors.  Christ knew that there were times to reveal and times to remain silent, and also knew that those around him struggled with knowing when to do each.  Christ witnessed that those with whom he lived judged their neighbor for a mistake, looking past their own error.  Christ saw that those around him struggled to live in a world that wasn’t only black and white.

A world that contains both Epiphany and the command to silence about the raising of Jairus’ daughter is a world far from black and white.  This is a world in which interior and exterior lives need to be reconciled, a world where the person I think I am and the person others think I am are never going to match up perfectly.  This is a world that works best and is most Christ-like when forgiveness, openness, and a desire to see the strengths of others is paramount in our minds.  We imitate Christ when we recognize that others struggle with being the person they want to be, the person Christ calls them to be.  We all have within us conflicting demands, parts that attract us in different directions.  And yet, though we are individuals, we are one Body, held together by the Christ who both commands us to witness to others and bids us also to remain silent and ponder secrets in the depths of our hearts.  We are a people of many differences, who struggle to be genuine.  We help one another and become more like Christ when we remember to always think well of one another, forgiving one another easily, and looking for the best in our neighbor.  I conclude my time with you now, thanking you for sharing with me these past six months the depths of your interior lives, the secrets of your inmost hearts.  I have been changed by the love you’ve shared and the openness and greatness of heart you’ve shown me.  Though I will not continue to be here each Sunday morning, remember that we are bound together as one Body, that our stories do not stand as only single monologues, but a great chorus.  You have helped me to learn that the efforts of others as they struggle to become the persons Christ desires them to be are my struggles too.  I leave with you, summing up both the tale of the conflict between our inner and outer minds and also summing up my experience here at St Simon’s these past six months, a prayer attributed to Mary Stuart, Queen of Scots:

Keep us, O God, from all pettiness.

Let us be large in thought, in word, in deed.

let us be done with fault-finding

and leave off all self-seeking.

May we put away all pretense

and meet each other face to face,

without self pity and without prejudice.

may we never be hasty in judgment,

and always be generous.

let us always take time for all things,

and make us to grow calm, serene and gentle.

Teach us to put into action our better impulses,

to be straightforward and unafraid.

Grant that we may realize

that it is the little things of life that create differences,

that in the big things of life, we are as one.

And, O Lord God, let us not forget to be kind!

 

Amen.


Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Belated sermon posts

So, I've been busy and haven't posted my latest sermon from a few weeks ago.  But, today was my last exam for the semester for grad school...a short respite until summer session begins on June 1!
The first sermon is from Good Friday, which was a bit challenging: it had been a long week, spending tim with a friend in the hospital after a tragic accident, and so Holy Week 2009 was a bit different than those in years past.
The second sermon is the Fourth Sunday of Easter.  I have one more sermon at St Simon's before my internship ends, then I go back to St Paul's Cathedral.  Gotta make it count!

John 18:1-19:42

In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.

Amen.

I was born in 1980, and have never known a world without a telephone.  I have never known a life without TV and newspapers, magazines, radio.  And when I was around 16, we got our first computer, and the Internet and since then my life has been replete with immediate communication, as I’m sure has been the case for many of you.  Images suddenly appear when requested.  Stories immediately surface.

Of course, many of you remember a time before this was so, when stories took time to read and the imagination was engaged to flesh that story out.  And the time which encompasses our living memory is only a minor part of the Church’s history, and for the majority of that history, stories were communicated differently than we now experience a story’s transmittal.  Stained glass windows, statues, murals and frescoes communicated stories.  Instead of newspapers and books, TV and Google, the stories which filled our lives entered through more physical and more human means. There was another very popular way, as well, that the Church employed to relay the Gospel story: the Passion Play.

In some places still today, Passion Plays are still enacted, depicting the end of Christ’s life.  But their place in the medieval Church’s life was drastically different than the role Passion Plays have in our world.  Passion Plays were a true making real again the story and experience of Christ’s Passion.  Over time, Passion Plays lost their importance in our tradition, but this evening let’s enact our own Passion Play, recreating here at St Simon’s this great medieval act.  But, let’s do so here in the depths of our minds, within our own hearts, in that place where we encounter Christ in prayer, where we have met him since we were small children.  If it helps you to close your eyes in order to concentrate and to enter into that room in your mind, please do so.

We’ve heard John’s telling of the Passion, so let’s be each player who interacts with Christ on His last day.  The first person we meet is Judas: Judas who had earlier that night shared a meal with Christ and the disciples, and now betrays Christ over to the hands of sinners, and betrays Him…with a kiss.  Judas is worried, Judas is threatened or fearful or angry.  But, no matter what Judas felt, his concerns for those feelings overcame his love for Christ.  We are Judas when we allow our concern for our own comforts and ease to overcome our love.  We are Judas when we betray Christ in the poor, in the sick.  We are Judas when we love imperfectly because we hold back out of fear, out of vulnerability, and out of anger. 

Next appears Peter.  Peter first reacts to Christ’s arrest that cool night in the garden with violence and denial, lashing out in anger.  And when he next surfaces in John’s Gospel, we are faced with Peter’s three denials.  Peter had left his home and his work to follow Christ, and surely was committed to Christ and had cleaved tightly to him.  But he flees from the scene of the arrest, abandoning his Lord, and when his name is linked with Christ, Peter vehemently rejects Christ, three times.  We are Peter in this Passion Play when we do not cling to Christ even in difficult times.  We are Peter when fear of recrimination stops us from doing what’s right, from speaking out against racism and the crushing weight placed on the working poor, from protesting the inequality in our society.  We are Peter when the consequences of our actions are too hard to deal with, so we sell ourselves short rather than choosing glory.  We are Peter when mere difficulties separate us from the love of Christ.

After his arrest, Jesus is sent by Annas the High Priest to the house of Pilate, Roman governor of Palestine.  Pilate judges Jesus and finds him innocent.  But Pilate listens to the cries of the crowd, and sentences Jesus to death, though he had been judged guilty of no crime.  In order to disassociate himself from his actions, Pilate symbolically washes his hands, declaring that he is not responsible for his behavior, that his choices are not tied to him.  We are Pilate when we refuse to acknowledge the consequences of our actions.  We are Pilate when we see no need in being responsible and owning up to our part of the violence and evil done on our behalf and because of our choices.  We are Pilate when we turn a blind eye to the suffering borne by others, by those in developing nations and within our own cities, in order to support our lifestyle and habits.  We are Pilate when we wash our hands of our part in the destruction of our planet, blind to our collusion in it.

Not all our Passion Play, though,  is betrayal, weakness, and treason.  Now, we behold John, the beloved disciple, and the faithful women.  Of all those who lived and ministered with Jesus, only John and a few women accompany him to his death.  Of the great crowds who hung on every word of Jesus’ preaching, the dozens of disciples and the 12 apostles, only John and a few women cling fast to Christ in his suffering and death.  Those faithful who accompany Jesus witness his destruction and behold a great wonder: Jesus reigning from the cross and changing from life into death.  We are the women and John when we choose to love God above our own fears and worries.  We are John when we accept love though it is unpopular, dangerous, and even threatens our lives.  We are the faithful women when shame, embarrassment, and horror cannot stop up from fidelity to Christ.  When we are confronted by the sublime, we are John and the faithful women when we remain and hold steady, trusting that this trial, like all things, shall pass, and that Christ, though destroyed, continues to reign.

Even after Christ’s death, our Passion Play continues, and we play the parts of Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea.  They request the body of Christ and prepare it for burial.  They secure a place for entombment, and complete the ritual of sealing and burial.  They served Christ as they were able, even in his death.  We are Joseph and Nicodemus when we believe that even the smallest and sometimes seemingly most insignificant acts are truly means of grace.  It is not the size of the love we have, but its intensity  of that love which shines through.  We are Joseph and Nicodemus when we hold in faith that small acts of charity to the sick, to those in prison, to the ill, the dying, the naked, the hungry, that these small acts are where God encounters a broken humanity and begins to heal.  We are Joseph and Nicodemus when we plant a seed and hope for its springing forth, for no greater seed was ever laid in the ground than the anointed, spiced, and wrapped body of the Lord, and no greater tree with no sweeter blossom, with no more glorious fruit would ever burst forth than at the opening of the tomb on Easter morning.

Amen.


And Easter 4:

1 John 3:16-24

John 10:11-18

In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.  Amen

 

The Fourth Sunday of Easter is well-known as Good Shepherd Sunday, aptly named for the reading from the 10th chapter of John’s Gospel, in which Christ refers to himself as the Good Shepherd, the shepherd who lays down his life for his sheep.  Mental images may subconsciously float up: a gently smiling Jesus with a shepherd’s crook in his hand and a wooly lamb over his shoulder; or a third-century mosaic of Christ amidst a large flock of snowy sheep.  The image of Christ as shepherd was one of the first to be depicted in Christian art, and began as a covert way to tell the story of the Gospel using images during a time of persecution and secrecy in the Church’s history.  The story and motif of Jesus as shepherd is an ancient one, and one which still speaks to us now.

But, like many ideas in our minds, particularly those associated with our faith, it’s always a good think to explore if how Scripture reads is the same as how we interpret.  For example, we imagine the Christmas scene at the stable as having oxen and sheep and donkeys, but nowhere in the Gospel does it mention animals being there.  It has passed into our collective reckoning of the Christmas panorama, though.  Same with the Good Shepherd: we conjure up pastoral images of a kind Jesus with meek sheep when we hear today’s Gospel.  But are we wrong?  Is that truly the context of the good shepherd?

Together, let’s flesh this story out a bit more.  First, we need to remind ourselves to whom Jesus is addressing the story of the good shepherd.  We may assume that Jesus is offering this story to his disciples, giving them a message of hope and tender love.  But the people to whom Jesus is speaking in this part of John’s Gospel are not his followers: they’re his opponents.  The Pharisees are testing Jesus, challenging Jesus, threatening Jesus.  Previous to his description of himself as the good shepherd, Jesus had healed a man born blind and had been challenged and denounced by the Pharisees for it.  He had manifested his ability to heal miraculously, and had been hunted by the Pharisees on account of it.  When the Pharisees catch up to him, the story which Jesus offers them is the good shepherd.  But why?

In this parable, Jesus is comparing his leadership of  Israel to the leadership offered by the current religious authorities, including the Pharisees.  He condemns their leadership and refers to them in the verse immediately before the one we read to today, as “thieves and robbers”  and then as cowards who “flee from the sheep when the wolf approaches”.  This is not a meekly smiling Jesus petting little lambs.  This is Jesus directly confronting and denouncing his accusers as false teachers, as those who lead Israel astray.

Of course, this is not the best way to make friends.  It’s unlikely Jesus was too concerned about making friends with the Pharisees, however.  Another layer of this story shows pretty clearly that Jesus was not there to make friends.  He was there to show what holiness and the love of God meant, what it looked like to love as God intended. The story of the good shepherd, like the miraculous healing of the man born blind, was a way that Christ would show his divinity.  The Pharisees listening to Jesus rebuking them would know immediately the use of the image of the good shepherd from their own scriptural tradition.  It was not our own image of adorable mewing lambs and a fatherly Jesus.  It was one which was long-entrenched.  We read Psalm 23 today, and that part of their tradition would have come to mind.  But another image, one deeply explosive would have been what surfaced in the minds of the Pharisees when they heard Jesus talking about being the good shepherd: an image that would transfix them, sear their minds, and horrify them.  Just like the good shepherd makes us think of a pastelly and white-robed Jesus in a clutch of lambs in a verdant field, the title of good shepherd would bring to the first-century Pharisees’ minds a very different tradition.  In the writings of the prophet Ezekiel, God himself rebukes the leaders of Israel, calls them false teachers, and says that he will remove all of them.  God calls them false shepherds and claims that they will be swept aside and that God himself will shepherd Israel.  He says in Ezekiel: I myself will tend my sheep.  When the Pharisees heard Jesus call himself by the title of the good shepherd, they knew that he was publicly declaring that the prophecy of Ezekiel was being realized in himself.  He was naming himself as the God of Israel, coming now to sweep aside the nation’s religious establishment, and lead himself.  In the verses which follow the good shepherd portion we heard, some people assume Jesus is insane, and others will want to stone him for blasphemy.  The intended meaning of his message of calling himself the good shepherd was quite clear to his listeners.

So what is this message to us, then, if the good shepherd might not be what we had always thought it was?  What in the gospel of the good shepherd is explosive to us, as the declaration of his divinity was so explosive to Christ’s hearers two millennia ago?  The best place to start answering that might be to explore why this Gospel shows up in Easter.  What is so Easterish about this gospel?

The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep.

The reason my Father loves me is that I lay down my life—only to take it up again.

Something may strike you as odd about that first passage I just reread from today’s Gospel:  a good shepherd doesn’t lay down his life for his sheep.  A very bad shepherd does.  A shepherd who has confused life and livelihood lays down his life for his sheep.  A person is a shepherd because the sheep are a commercial interest from which he gains profit, off of which he makes a living.  A shepherd laying down his life for his sheep is like a fisherman laying down his life for cod.  But Christ claims himself as the good shepherd, and says that he lays down his life for his sheep.  And, he continues, this is the very reason why his father loves him: that he lays down his life.  And then something else odd: he lays down his life for his sheep only to take it up again.

This is the core of the Easter message in this gospel: out of love Christ laid down his life for us, only to take it up again.  The theme of laying down a life in order to take it back up is a repeated one in scripture, and, I would argue, in my life and in your lives.  One of the well-known stories of laying down a life in order to pick it up again is the sacrifice of Isaac by Abraham in Genesis.  Abraham had accepted that God asked him to sacrifice his only son, Isaac.  Abraham walked with his son up Mt Horeb, accepting that his son would die that day.  When, at the moment of sacrifice, God intervened and saved Isaac, Abraham received him back as someone who had returned from the dead.  For Isaac’s life had truly been laid down, only to be taken up again.  In his anger over the darkness and sin of his creation, God sent the flood, and destroyed the world’s life, he took it up again through Noah and the remnant safely guarded in the ark.  In the Gospel, Christ called the rich young man who seeks perfection to lay everything down, to give it to the poor and to follow him.  Though the rich young man didn’t know it, had he laid down everything and followed Jesus, he would have gained it all back.

And in my life and your lives?  Have we never experienced this laying down in order to take it back up again?  Hopefully, my sermon today is a small example: we laid down our comfortable and scripturally-incomplete picture of the good shepherd, only to take it up again in a broader context.  But we do this in large things, too: when a loved one is struggling with an addiction and our actions enable that addiction to continue, we may need to sacrifice that relationship in order to start to bring about healing.  After healing has begun, we take that relationship back up, renewed and strengthened.  The process of mourning the loss of a job , the death of a friend, the ending of a marriage, a child moving from home to go to college: these can feel like you lay down your life, and when you cross over from mourning, you find a newer life, and take it up again.  Laying aside your prejudices and old ways of understanding only to take up a new way can help you to constantly transform yourself into the person Christ knows you can be.

It is unlikely that we will be called to literally lay down our lives.  I think one reason why the martyrs fascinate us and why we celebrate them so gloriously in our church’s tradition is because we almost envy the frankness of their sacrifice.  It was clearer for those who suffered and died for their faith to relate their lives to Christ who laid down his life in order to take it up again.  The martyrs trusted that their suffering and death and the laying down of their lives would bring them after death to a place where they would take their lives back up.  But we too, are called to imitate Christ, just like the martyrs are.  We probably won’t be fed to lions or roasted on a grill, or executed by arrows, or have our eyes plucked out, or be crucified upside down or boiled alive, or beheaded.  By the way, those are each ways that some very important saints were martyred.  We won’t likely be called on to witness to Christ in any of those ways, and to then experience Christ’s resurrection ourselves as we take back up the life we had laid down in witness. But when we live knowing that the things we lay down in this life are transformative and lead us to taking up a greater Easter life, we live as Christ desires us to live: joyfully, in imitation of him as good shepherd.

 

Amen. 


Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Like Wheat that Springeth Green

I think this has been my favorite sermon I've preached at St Simon's so far.  Since it was the fifth Sunday in the month, the service was morning prayer, so the sermon was extra lengthy.

Hebrews 5:5-10

John 12:20-33


In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.  Amen.

This is our final Sunday in Lent, as next week, we will be celebrating the Lord’s entry into Jerusalem, welcoming him with palms and our loud hosannas, and next Sunday we will read the Passion Gospel, telling of the Christ’s suffering and death.  Next week is a week for paradox: triumphant and welcoming entry followed by betrayal and crushing death.

But this Sunday is paradoxical for a different reason: here at St Simon’s we are celebrating together today using Morning Prayer as our primary Sunday service, instead of the Eucharist, as we usually do.  This is the fifth week in March, and so, as is customary in some parishes, we are gathered this Sunday to worship using the liturgy of Morning Prayer.  As happens rarely, every single Sunday in Lent this year fell in March.  It will not happen again until the year 2020.

So, a few words about the use of Morning Prayer as the principal service on a Sunday.  This will be my actual first time even attending Morning Prayer when it’s used as the primary Sunday service, and at the 10o’clock service, I’m the officiant!  The Episcopal church I grew up in always had the Eucharist on Sunday, but that is due to the liturgical changes which occurred in the Episcopal Church during the 1960s and 1970s.  I’m sure many of you who are cradle Episcopalians remember Morning Prayer on Sundays.

It is an ancient tradition of the Church to break the day into parts, called hours, and assign specific prayers, known as offices, to each part of the day.  Traditionally, the hours begin with Matins, in the night, Lauds at dawn, Prime at 6am, Terce at 9am, Sext at noon, Vespers at dusk, and Compline at night before bed.  This was the pattern in most of Western Europe, and before the English Reformation, the primary service on Sunday  in England began at dawn with Lauds, and then the celebration of the Holy Eucharist.  It was uncommon before the Reformation for laity to receive communion more than once yearly, so after liturgical reforms were made in England, the importance of reception of the Eucharist was underscored, and the frequency with which the Eucharist was received increased.  But the principal service of many Sundays switched over to Lauds, which we call Morning Prayer in our Book of Common Prayer.  The tradition of celebrating Holy Eucharist monthly and receiving Hoy communion monthly was a drastic change from pre-Reformation practice, and was intended to make the Eucharist more accessible and more frequently received by the laity.

Over the centuries since the English Reformation, as the Anglican church spread across the globe and to our country, this tradition remained fairly common, until only a few decades ago.  There was a major liturgical movement in the 19th century, known by various names: the Tractarian Movement, the Oxford Movement, the Catholic Movement, which sought to reintroduce Catholic traditions back into Anglican worship.  And we shouldn’t think of necessarily Roman Catholic traditions, but Catholic traditions: those aspects of worship which belonged to the ancient Church.  But that movement stayed pretty small, in terms of relative numbers of parishes.  Those parishes are commonly now known Anglo Catholic or High Church.  The leading High Church in our diocese is St Andrew’s, in University Heights.  In those parishes, Eucharist began to be celebrated weekly as the principal Sunday service.  That change wouldn’t happen to most parishes, however, until our own lifetimes, and primarily happened because of the publishing of the new 1979 Prayer Book which encouraged weekly celebration of the Eucharist.

So, if our current Prayer Book encourages weekly celebration of the Holy Eucharist, why are we celebrating Morning Prayer today?  The wealth of our Anglican tradition is most deeply expressed when we display the aspects of our tradition which unify and unite us:  we illustrate our continuity and we embrace our heritage when we celebrate Morning Prayer as the principal Sunday service.  We are united to those who went before us and who passed on to us the tradition which shapes and informs us.  Continuity with the past is the primary reason why almost all parishes continue to use Elizabethan language when reciting the Lord’s prayer, whether it’s Rite I, Rite II, 1928, or any other prayer book.  By using the same words our ancestors used, we remind ourselves of the very real connections we maintain with them.  The Lord they worshiped at Morning Prayer is the same Lord we worship in Holy Communion.

In the Gospel today, we hear that same Lord speaking to Philip and Andrew, two of the apostles, using a pastoral theme to relate the message of his upcoming death: "The hour has come for the Son of Man to be glorified. 24I tell you the truth, unless a kernel of wheat falls to the ground and dies, it remains only a single seed. But if it dies, it produces many seeds.

The people hearing Christ would have immediately understood the imagery he used, and though most of us here are not farmers, there’s likely to be a few gardeners among us.

My first experience of gardening happened when I was 5, at Winfield St Elementary School in Corning, NY, when I was in kindergarten.  I’m not sure what the practice has been here in Buffalo, but in Corning, we attended kindergarten for a half day for the first half of the year, then a full day beginning in the spring.  I had difficulties adjusting to the change of a full day of kindergarten, and remember feeling very homesick.  However, it got much better for me when we started a new unit in which we learned about plants and seeds.  Our teacher read to us about acorns and oak trees, and fuzzy gray dandelion heads.  The most exciting day, though, was when we each received a white Styrofoam cup with dirt in it.  I was something of a dirt eater, or at least, a dirt sampler, so I was very excited, but remembered that I shouldn’t eat this dirt, since my teacher told me we’d be putting a seed in it, and that the seed needed the dirt and water and the sun to grow.

Along with the cup, each of us received a few cucumber seeds: they were small, flat, pointy at one end, and smooth to touch.  We stuck our little fingers into the dirt and pushed the cucumber seeds down, poured a little water onto them, placed them on the ledge by the window, and left them there to grow. 

Each day, the first thing any of us did when coming into class was run over to the ledge to check our dirt cups with our sleeping seeds.  And cups of dirt they remained.  Each day: nothing.  The next morning, new bright expectation, a dash to the ledge: nothing.

Then one day, there was a tiny green bump in a cup in the first row, and 20 proud 5-year old parents peered into the Styrofoam cup, overjoyed at the tiny bump.  Each morning, more and more and more bumps in the Styrofoam cups, then stems, then leaves.  In my cup, one of my little plants came up and still had the husk of its seed wrapped around its leaf.  I recognized the smooth white skin of the seed, opened like a butterfly in flight, and the point pulled apart and separated.

Not since kindergarten has my gardening joy been so bright and buoyant, but each spring still finds me out there, with seeds or tiny sapling plants, still pushing them into the soil to grow.  My kindergarten plants actually produced cucumber fruit, and I was amazed when we first cut open the fruit and inside: dozens of smooth, white seeds!  The tiny little white seed I had planted had exploded out of my Styrofoam cup and blossomed into bright yellow flowers which became huge cucumbers replete with identical white seeds.  Miraculous.

Soon forgotten were the days of expectation and wonder: would the plant ever grow?  Would the seeds wake up?  Though I was a very precocious 5-year old, the results were far beyond even my imagination.  Gone was the anxiety of let down expectations.  Gone was the worry about if there was something wrong.  It was replaced wholly with joy in the form of a huge cucumber.  I was overjoyed because of the surprise: my teacher had told us the little seeds would grow into plants then into cucumbers, but she had not impressed on me how radical the change would be.  Then in such a short time, the Styrofoam cup was tipping over because of the weight of that radical change.  I knew something impressive was going to happen, but I was not prepared for how amazingly different, how overflowing that change would be.  From one tiny seed to a huge cucumber bursting with dozens of little seeds.  Miraculous.

My experience of the little white Styrofoam cup prepared me for my later encounters with the Lord as an adolescent, teenager and adult.  In the little Styrofoam cup, I lived what has been called “the wastefulness of creation”: God responds to the smallest effort, the tiniest seed with an abundance larger than the imagination could have formed.  My wonder at how impressive and unexpected the results of that little smooth seed would be mirrors my later wonder at God’s response to and action in the world.

As mentioned in the Epistle to the Hebrews read today, though God could have sent an angel, could have sent another prophet, could have appeared again as a burning bush, instead, he chose to clothe himself in human flesh and live upon the earth as Christ.  The response of God to the needs of the world was beyond anyone’s imagination.

Christ refers to himself as wheat that is planted in order to produce an abundant harvest.  It is as God the Creator that he refers to himself here.  Christ takes the smallest seeds, and creates from it more than any mind could have guessed, more than any heart could have hoped for.  But neither the cucumber seed in my Styrofoam cup nor Christ could bring out more than could be imagined unless they accepted change.  For the cucumber seed, it meant opening, breaking, and shedding its smooth outside, to let the plant inside shoot out.  I saw what remained of the seed on my tiny little shoot: opened, and empty.  For Christ it was the same.  He was wheat planted, and in order to become a field of grain, Christ needed to be opened, broken, and had to shed his appearance.  He achieved in the crucifixion the change in his body which would allow new life to spring forth, and to spring forth in abundance.

Next Friday, as we pass from Maundy Thursday to Good Friday and on to Holy Saturday and Easter Sunday, we witness the great change of Christ as he is buried in the earth, and as his death changes him and when he rises out of the earth, like my little cucumber plant, he will be other than we first saw him, bursting with life, and spreading, growing, and creating abundant life.

My favorite Easter hymn, which truly is a Holy Week hymn more than just Easter, is entitle Now the Green Blade Riseth.  It’s hymn 204, if you’d like to follow along with me:

Now the green blade riseth from the buried grain,

Wheat that in the dark earth many days has lain;

Love lives again, that with the dead has been:

Love is come again, like wheat that springeth green.

 

In the grave they laid him, love whom men had slain,

Thinking that never he would wake again.

Laid in the earth like grain that sleeps unseen:

Love is come again, like wheat that springeth green,

 

Forth he came at Easter, like the risen grain,

He that for three days in the grave had lain.

Quick from the dead my risen Lord is seen:

Love is come again, like wheat that springeth green.

 

When our hearts are wintry, grieving, or in pain,

Thy touch can call us back to life again;

Fields of our hearts that dead and bare have been:

Love is come again, like wheat that springeth green.

 

Laid in the earth, like grain that sleeps unseen.  I was fooled by my little white seed, and worried that I had stuck it in the dirt and nothing would come of it.  Frequently, we wonder if the things we’ve begun, if the plans we’ve laid, the hope we’ve tried to give a grieving friend, or the love we’ve shown our children is going to be enough.  But the seeds we plant do not bloom overnight, and we may need to wait quite a while before the results show.  The hope and love we give others is like my sleeping seed, is like the buried Christ: a promise of change, of grace, and of abundance.

Christ uses the imagery of wheat because it was well known to those listening to him.  The image would have sticking power.  But he is also alluding to something else when he describes himself as a grain of wheat: he’s pointing to himself as present in the Eucharist.  In the Eucharist, Christ is a single seed who is multiplied over and over in order to give life to many, like in the parable in today’s Gospel.  It’s a bit ironic that today’s Gospel falls on a fifth Sunday, when we are celebrating Morning Prayer and not Holy Eucharist.  But maybe it gives us the opportunity to reflect on Christ in the Eucharist, since we will not be receiving communion today.  Will we feel different this week, since we did not have communion?  Is anything different? 

The Eucharist is not solely for us, but for those who are not here with us on Sunday.  The closing dismissal given by Fr Ralph commands us to go into the world, to love and serve the Lord.  We are to receive the Eucharist here at the rail, then become the Eucharist to those in the world.  In that way, we become the tiny seed which is planted, but which springs back up as a field of grain.

Our God comes to us every on Sunday in the form of bread and wine, as a tiny seed which has fallen to the earth and now is sprung up in multitude to feed many.  Let s take the opportunity this week, to thank Christ for his life shared with us in the Eucharist.  The small lamp burning above the aumbry reminds us that the Eucharist is here present, and that the Lord dwells here.  On Good Friday, though, the aumbry door will be open, the lamp will be out, and the Eucharist will be absent.  The church will be uninhabited by Christ in the Eucharist.  How much more complete our joy will be on Easter, when once again, we celebrate the Eucharist, joining with Christ in his resurrection, like wheat that springeth green.

Sunday, March 8, 2009

The Great Enemy and Peter


It's the Second Sunday in Lent, and I had my second opportunity to preach at St Simon's where I'm interning for the first half of 2009.  I had a great Gospel on which to preach: Jesus and Peter get in a fight and Jesus calls Peter Satan.
Like many Christians who spend ay time thinking about our faith, Satan fascinates me.  He had a special attraction to Peter, apparently.  Peter, with one exception, is the only apostle who the Gospel mentions captures Satan's attention directly.  The other, of course, is Judas, and we know how poorly that turned out for Judas.
So, I talked about Satan and Peter: there was certainly fodder enough from Scripture to keep that fire burning.  I'm not very moved by nor interested in the concept of spiritual warfare, and I think it seems a little Dungeons& Dragons for me, but preached on it today.  It was an interesting process, for me at least.
Since I was preaching on Peter, I included a dig on the papacy, but hopefully it was subtle enough to be overlooked!
To the right is the image of a painting by William Blake, showing Satan rousing the rebel angels.  I had Blake and his understanding of Satan in mind as I tried to go over and preach on this Gospel.  Please comment!

Here are the lessons:

In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost,

Amen.

George Orwell, the British author who penned the well-known classics, Animal Farm  and 1984 is attributed with having said: “Good people sleep peacefully in their beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.”  What may first come to mind when we hear this quote might be the image of our military or police officers, sworn to defend us, and to do so even at the risk of their own harm.  Instead of our armed forced and constabulary in the role of rough men standing guard, I’d like to suggest Christ in that role.  Today’s gospel offers a picture of Christ as a rough man, ready to do violence on our behalf.

In Mark’s Gospel read today, as Christ discusses his upcoming Passion with his disciples, it become clear that Simon Peter is troubled.  The gospel reads that Peter drew Jesus aside, and Peter likely conveyed his displeasure to Jesus about the idea of Jesus’ death.  In fact, Mark’s Gospel today says that Peter even rebuked Jesus over talking about the Passion.  Then in turn, Jesus rebukes Peter.  In English, we render the word as ‘rebuke’, but the Gospels were originally written in Greek, and the word used both to describe what Peter did to Jesus and what Jesus did to Peter is epitimaō. It’s a word used often in the Gospels: when Jesus calms the stormy sea from the boat, when Jesus removed the fever from Simon Peter’s mother-in-law, and in several different places when Christ exorcises demons, he rebukes them and orders them to come out. In the Gospel, Epitimaō is used to confront an obstacle or an adversary, and it’s used to describe the way that Peter talked to Jesus, and the way Jesus responded to Peter.  It is harsh.  Other words are used in Greek in the gospels to rebuke and chide in order to lead to repentance and a change of heart. Epitimaō is used only to silence, and to silence roughly.

It’s not recorded in the Gospel what Peter says exactly to Jesus, but we do get to hear what Jesus says to Peter.  Jesus is clearly displeased with Peter, and in fact, the gospel reads that he dragged Peter out in front of everyone in order to upbraid him publicly.  In front of the other apostles, Jesus calls Peter Satan, the ancient accuser, the opponent, the devil.  He goes even further and, as the Gospel records, calls in the entire crowd and makes Peter’s humiliation complete by rebuking Peter in front of everyone, and hints that Peter might be ashamed of Jesus because Jesus had foretold the necessity of the Passion.  And Jesus hints that he might be ashamed of Peter because of Peter’s reaction.

This is not a pretty picture.  In our churches and chapels, there are no stained glass windows of this scene, dedicated piously in memoriam.  It is an ugly scene of a public fight between Peter and Jesus.  We likely wonder, why would Jesus react so harshly?  Why would he publicize his violent rejection of Peter’s displeasure?  Maybe we can understand Peter’s position: Peter didn’t want to lose Jesus, Peter wanted everything to stay the same, Peter couldn’t imagine Jesus’ death as anything but destruction and mutilation.  Jesus is described frequently in scripture as being gentle, a loving and kind shepherd, but here Jesus slaps down one of his favorite and closest friends.  And does so in front of everyone.

But there’s more, of course to this story.  And there are more characters.  It’s not a coincidence, then, that Jesus chose the particular words he hissed at Peter: Jesus called Peter Satan.  And it shouldn’t surprise us.  The story of Simon Peter in the Gospels, is closely linked with the story of Jesus, but also is closely linked with the story of Satan. 

Today, when we read the Gospel, we may prefer to interpret Satan and the role he plays simply as the fallen state of man, or we think of Satan as merely the  general state of the tendency to be tempted and to sin.  We may prefer to replace the word ‘Satan’ in the Gospels with the word ‘evil’.  We may not think of Satan as a personal entity, but a catch-all phrase for difficulty and distance from God.  However.  However, the Gospels are explicit that this is not the way Jesus and the apostles understood Satan.  The Gospels portray Satan as a person, and as someone who converses with Jesus. And this is the context in which Peter comes up again.  Jesus and Satan were not strangers to one another.  They were well-known to each other, and regularly had discussions and encounters.  In a very telling exchange,I Luke’s Gospel, Jesus tells Peter, “Simon, Simon, behold, Satan has desired to have you, that he may sift you like wheat: but I have prayed for you, that your faith may not fail; and when you have turned again, strengthen your brothers."  There is a triangle of relationships between Jesus, Peter, and Satan.  In this Gospel, Jesus describes himself as standing between Simon Peter and Satan, shielding Simon Peter from Satan’s desire to sift him like wheat.  In Mark’s Gospel read today, Jesus’ acidic reaction to Peter portrays Jesus rebuking or casting out Satan’s hold over Peter.

Again, it is pretty evident that the writer of Mark’s Gospel felt that Satan was not a name under which was classified various evils, various devils and vices.  Satan was the ancient enemy, the tempter, drawing Peter to question and tempt Jesus to deny the Passion, as Satan had tempted Jesus in the desert, offering him kingdoms and power.  We see a subtle side of Satan here, working through Peter’s own fears in order to try to break Christ from his appointed mission.

Christ realizes the utter seriousness of the situation; the desire to abandon the Passion may have been a very real one for Christ.  Satan’s subtlety was ingenious in playing to that potential weakness in Christ, using the voice of Peter, a close and loving friend.  Turning Christ from the Passion was critical to Satan, and the means by which to turn Christ were unlimited; nothing was out of bonds, nothing untouchable, even a best friend and his best intentions.

There is, of course, a wonderful adage that the road to hell is paved with good intentions.  And we could safely assume that Peter’s intentions were the best.  But when Peter was more concerned with his desire that things should stay the way they were, that Christ should not suffer and die, Peter placed his own preferences before the will of his God.  It sounds like the best of intentions, it sounds like a minor thing, the smallest of faults.  It was evil.  It was Satan, rubbing his hands in triumphant glee.  It was sin.

For Peter, and frequently for many of us, the small sins, the tiniest catering to our own pleasures, desires, gluttony, or greed are the ones we so easily overlook.  We’re not murderers, after all.  We don’t rob defenseless old ladies, of course.  We don’t steal nor blaspheme, we don’t commit sacrilege, nor simony, nor regicide, nor sloth, nor wrath.  We don’t destroy our neighbor nor seek to tear down Christ and His church.  True, we may sin in small things.  In small things.

And when Peter simply erred?  When Peter, in a small way, put his preferences before God’s will?  Jesus finds Satan lurking behind Peter’s seemingly innocent little fault.  Jesus sees Satan working at Peter, he sees Satan sifting Peter like wheat.  Jesus swiftly intervenes, rebuking Satan with Peter’s voice. “Good people sleep peacefully in their beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.”

We don’t imagine that we would ever be confronted with an encounter in which we could choose to sell our souls in order to gain the whole world.  However, Christ also tells us to guard against selling our souls for almost nothing.  He instructs us to guard against selling our souls for the tiniest bit of pleasure, or revenge, or just a moment of spite, or a selfish moment of putting our whims before God’s plans.  Souls are not so frequently lost to the sins of murder and arson and calumny, as they are lost to backbiting, to spiteful thoughts about the person next to us in the pew, to unkindness in our daily lives.  We, too, are being sifted like wheat.

But Christ prays for us, as he prayed for Peter.  Christ rebukes Satan when he speaks with our voice.  Christ is the rough man standing ready to do violence on our behalf.  That violence is the immolation of his own body and the destruction of Satan’s hold over us.  The hand of Satan on us is not heavy, and may rest so gently we are unaware of its clutch on our own shoulder, with it creeping fingers and its grasping palm.  Satan’s hand almost is gentle enough that it is unperceived, and we grow accustomed to it.  But Christ stands as intercessor, imposing himself between us and Satan’s hold, between Peter and Satan’s hold on him.  We work with Christ in opposing Satan’s reign in our lives when we seek to follow the divine mind in each of our daily interactions, and when we realize that even the seemingly smallest of sins is a rejection of God’s will, and an acceptance of a stronger embrace of those creeping fingers and that grasping palm.

Last week, the First Sunday in Lent, we prayed together the Great Litany, one of the oldest Anglican liturgical works we’ve inherited.  Since its conception in the 16th century, it has changed very little, except for the removal of a prayer to be saved from the tyrannye of the bishop of Rome and all his detestable enormities.  One of the invocations which remained, however, and which we prayed last week,

That it may please thee to strengthen such as do stand; to
comfort and help the weak-hearted; to raise up those who
fall; and finally to beat down Satan under our feet,
We beseech thee to hear us, good Lord.

We still plead with Christ to strengthen us and to trample down the great enemy, who opposed Jesus by leading Peter to challenge the necessity of the Passion.  We still plead that we, today, will be strengthened and Satan defeated, that what may seem like the smallest of faults be exposed and converted, that the will of God might more completely encompass us and guide our hearts, that we may continue to sleep peacefully in our beds at night.

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Lazy


So, I've not posted in almost a year...I'm lazy.
But, one of my Lenten disciplines is to post weekly.  And since I need to have a reason to post, I figured I would throw my most recent sermon up on my post, and elicit feedback!  I expect it to be unsuccessful, but baby steps are best.

I'm at St Simon's for the first half of 2009, doing my internship as I continue my discernment and formation toward ordination.  The building (pictured) is beautiful, eclipsed only by the people there.

So, here's the sermon I delivered last Sunday, Feb 22, 2009, at St Simon's, South Buffalo.  It was the Last Sunday in Epiphany, and the lessons were as follows:

So, please read and comment!  If I don't grow as a preacher, I'll blame everyone else.

In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.

Amen

A few weeks ago, when I had been here for a week or two, I was wandering around and enjoying the beauty of St Simon’s windows.  In the sanctuary, I stopped at the large window behind me, depicting the crucifixion.  It was created from an unusual angle, looking up from the side, rather than directly on Christ as he hung from the cross.  In my mind’s eye, I imagined who might have had that viewpoint of Christ as he hung dying.  St John?  Christ’s mother, Mary?  Fr Ralph mentioned to me then that the Christmas tree is displayed near that window, and he had reflected on the juxtaposition of the tree representing Christ’s birth growing next to the window illustrating His death.  I’ve been thinking, lately, of just those juxtapositions in the story of Christ’s life, when life is coupled with death, doubt with hope, revelation with missing the point, and like in Christ’s transfiguration in the Gospel today: divine glory with foretelling of ignoble death.

On January 6, we celebrated the great feast of the church that lends its name to the entire season that follows it: Epiphany.  On that day, we were mesmerized by a bright alluring star, and mesmerized by the Magi whom that star had coerced to leave their homes in the East.  Today closes the season that those Magi inaugurated.  The trip of those Mai is summarized in only a few verses, namely as they achieved their ultimate destination in Bethlehem, but their trip surely lasted weeks.  What were they thinking as they crossed difficult terrain, in pursuit of what must have seemed like such a tiny new glow far from their homes?  How sure of themselves were they as they trekked to the west?  What if they were wrong?  What if they had made a mistake?  How many times did doubts arise and how many times had they questioned during their long journey whether all their trouble would be worth what they hoped to find at the star’s resting place?  Imagine how weary they were, crossing barren and lonely desert, hoping against hope that their mission would be fruitful.  The Gospel speaks of the Magi’s success and joy, but that success and joy was only a result of the unmentioned struggle and hardship they endured to achieve it.  So, this is the juxtaposition of Epiphany: the entire season is named for their success, for their wonder and amazement; might it also be named for their doubt and insecurity, for their perseverance in the face of difficulties and contradictory desires?  This Sunday is the last Sunday in the season of Epiphany, and our Gospel today, then, points back to their work and travel to Bethlehem, least among the villages of Judah.  Our Gospel today, as Christ is transfigured on Tabor, is the last Epiphany in the season.

Our story of Christ today in the Gospel, like the Epiphany story, includes brilliant light.  Instead of a hovering star glowing above an infant Christ, now, on Mt Tabor, Christ Himself is the star.  The Magi came as Gentiles, and received the news that God had taken on a body of flesh, and appeared as an infant, with the star pointing and leading the Gentile Magi to come and worship.  On Mt Tabor, Christ does not reveal Himself to Gentiles as God to be worshiped as he did with the Magi as an infant: on Tabor, Christ reveals Himself to his apostles, sons of the chosen people, as God to be worshipped.   Christ’s first Epiphany to the Gentile Magi is perfected by his epiphany now to the Chosen people, as light to be followed, amidst difficulties and doubts, searing deserts and an almost painful expectation of joy.  Six days earlier, as the Gospel today recounts, Peter had confessed Christ to be the Messiah.  On Tabor, Christ confirms that He is Messiah, and that the Messiah is God enfolded in human flesh.

It’s pretty clear that Peter didn’t get the point.  He was overwhelmed by the events, almost babbling, and clearly not coherent.  Upon seeing Christ glowing, attended by the great Jewish heroes, Moses and Elijah, instead of falling down in worship and awe, Peter offers to put up tents.  Maybe the moment was so great that he wanted it to last forever, and so he offered to put up tents in order to make this epiphany on Tabor permanent.  But permanent things have a tendency to be fixed, Peter.  Permanent things do not grow;  permanent things do not change; permanent things are not Transfigured things. And Peter was never the best at change, it seems.  So, no tents were built, and Moses and Elijah went away.  The transfigured Christ became his everyday self again, and the Transfiguration was over.  But the change was not yet completed.  As they left the mountain, Christ told them that they were not to speak of what they had seen until He had risen from the dead.  And here is the juxtaposition in the transfiguration:  the White Christ, shining in supernatural and terrible light, returns to his normal life and then speaks of his death.  What a contrast: the divine Christ who converses with the giants of the Jewish past would be crushed in death.

The transfiguration is always the last Gospel every year as Epiphany ends and Lent begins.  It is a bridge that leads us and connects us to both glory and horror.  During Epiphany, we are reminded both of the cradle and of the cross, and particularly in the Transfiguration, we witness the resplendent God who shines through His human body and reveals his glory.  But in the midst of His shining through, He speaks of His death.  The transfiguration concludes Epiphany, and inaugurates Lent.

During Lent, we will hear of temptation, of opposition, of suffering, pain, bleeding sweat, whipping, betrayals, and crucified flesh.  And then.  There’s always an And then.  After the suffering, the pain, the death, and then there is glory.  After the blood and the whipping and the betrayals of Lent, and then there is the resplendent Christ, clothed in light like on Mt Tabor.  The and then of Epiphany is Christ’s death, but the And then of Lent is Christ’ s resurrection.

The life of Christ is a series of And thens: no joy is not coupled with sorrow and no pain is not followed by glory.  But this is not just a pattern in Christ’s life: it’s our story, too.  How many times in our own lives have we witnessed good come from a defeat?   I might lose my job, but then realize I want to do something completely different, anyway, and never would have taken the initiative to pursue my dream, had I not been encountered by the need to.  You might be wrapped up in the joy of having a new baby, which leads you to reflect on others who lack joy in their lives, and to pray for the joyless.  Our victories and successes are always balanced by sobering truths: no matter how accomplished, wealthy, admired I might be, I too will grow old, sicken, and pass the way of all flesh.  And no matter how sick, weak, and less autonomous I become as I age, I will pass into glory, prepare for me since the foundation of the world.  As a church, we may wring our hands, wondering why fewer each year turn toward the church for support and the living of a common life in faith.   We may think that these are the darkest of times, and  we may wonder if we will see in our own lifetimes the end of our tradition and if across our nation, no church will remain open.  But these dark thoughts must be coupled with faith in Christ and his work in the world as Lord of the Church: the Church has suffered worse challenges, and the Christ who was transfigured on Tabor is the one who guides the Church, and who will shepherd its ultimate end, all for the greater glory.  No worry or horror is without hope, and no success or triumph will last forever, and the challenges we face as individuals, as a community, and as a nation will end.  Each Christmas morning must be eventually followed by Calvary’s afternoon.  And every sealed tomb, will, in turn, burst forth again in new life.  Lent is not separated and disconnected from Epiphany.  Actually, in the Transfiguration glory is coupled with a prediction of suffering, and we see that Lent is Epiphany’s natural progression. 

How well, then, do we accept and embrace the transfigurations in our own lives?  When the things to which we’ve grown accustomed shake off their earthly appearance and display their divine nature, how frequently do we take notice?  Transfigurations happen everyday to us.  But do we notice them everyday?  Elisha witnessed a transfiguration, and immediately accepted and allowed himself to be changed by accepting that Elijah was leaving him, and that things would not be the same.  And Peter?  He struggled with transfiguration, and had difficulty with thinking that Christ could be something other than what Peter had experienced Christ as.  Peter fumbled when he witnessed Christ shining as God, and he stumbled when he heard Christ foretell his death.  Peter may not have wanted Christ as a gloriously shining God and may not have wanted Christ as a dead body.  He wanted Christ as the teacher and friend he knew; Peter was comfortable with that Christ, and any transfigured Christ disturbed him.

Don’t we find, sometimes, that we do not want to be transfigured, and don’t want transfiguration touching our lives?  As we have seen, transfiguration is disrupting, can be painful, and requires change.  I know that I rail against change sometimes and can feel that the stress and struggle that are part of transfiguration might be too much.  Maybe the Magi wanted to give up.  Peter certainly struggled with it for quite a while.  But each time we accept that God works to transfigure us, works to make our sorrows joyful and works to ground us in times of plenty, each time we work with God in our own Transfiguration, we, too, shine like Christ on Mt Tabor.  Rarely do we get to see it, and never do we get to build tents and bask in it forever.  But radiant light shines out of each of us, through the tiniest of cracks, and we can just catch a glimpse of the divine glory in all of our neighbors, in the person kneeling next to you at the communion rail or in front f you at Wegman’s.  It’s hard, sometimes to see that light of Tabor in those around us.  But nothing changes the fact that it’s there.  We are a transfigured people, and need to work diligently at becoming a transfiguring people, who accept change as growth, and are never afraid of the growing darkness of night, of storm clouds and distant thunder.  Our Christ is the White Christ, resplendent and glorious, who underwent all pain in order to transfer to us all glory.  In the crib under the Star of Bethlehem at Epiphany, shining with Moses and Elijah on Mt Tabor, and hanging from the tree and gasping lowly, Christ is Transfigured and invites us to accept our own Transfiguration.

Amen.